Court: County Must Honor Police Union Arbitration Agreement

Maryland Court of Appeals reverses lower court decision on a grievance filed over changes to health insurance costs.

As many as 400 retired police department employees could see a reduction in their health insurance costs and be due a refund for charges since 2007.

A state Court of Appeals ruling Monday effectively affirmed arbitration and a Baltimore County Circuit Court decision on the case that dates back to 2007. [A copy of the court rulling is attached to this article.]

The Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 4, which represents county police officers, filed a grievance five years ago after the county increased the costs of health insurance for employees who retired between Feb. 1, 1992 and June 30, 2007.

On July 1, 2007, the county changed its share of retiree health insurance costs from an 85-15 split with retirees to an 84-16 percentage.

The union argued that its contract with the county locked in an individual's share of the insurance costs based on what was in place at the time of retirement until the employee became eligible for Medicare.

The county argued that it was under no obligation to take the union's grievance to arbitration because the contract year-to-year had expired.

The judges ruled that the language in the agreement was broad and did not exclude taking grievances from an expired agreement to arbitration.

"We agree with the Circuit Court’s decision to leave undisturbed the arbitrator’s findings in this case," the judges wrote in its 37-page ruling. "The fact that the [contract] has expired does not mean the County had no duty to arbitrate disputes arising out of that [contract]. A dispute may be arbitrable after the expiration of the underlying agreement, if the agreement contained a broad arbitration clause and the rights that are the subject of the dispute accrued or vested during the life of the agreement."

Cole Weston, president of the union, said the ruling will decrease health insurance costs for as many as 400 retirees represented by the police union.

"The county has to restore the subsidy for people who retired between Feb. 1, 1992 and June 30, 2007 to what it was at the time they retired—that's phase one," Weston said. "Phase two is that the county will have to refund the difference between that rate and what the county has been charging since July 1, 2007.

A county spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment.

John L. November 20, 2012 at 02:08 PM
Congrats to the FOP for taking this case to court. The County seems to feel they can do whatever they want to erode employee benefits, well that is not the case here. The FOP and other groups are watching closely and protecting the benefits of their members & that is how it should be.
Lablover November 20, 2012 at 02:57 PM
You would think that after all of the court cases that were started by Fred Homan and lost the county executive would get rid of him. Of course KK is just like the former county executive Jim Smith who lets Fred run the county!
John T. November 30, 2012 at 09:31 PM
Where do I sign up for such a sweet health care split of 85-15. Government workers should not be entitled to any more than what is the normal rates in the private sector. These beauracrats will continue to hose the taxpayer with these goofy contracts that they agree to. Another tab for the taxpayers to just shut up and keep paying!
Lablover November 30, 2012 at 09:36 PM
John T. I guess you could start by applying to the Police department, go through the academy, work all 3 shifts in all kind of nasty weather, put your life on the line for the citizens of Baltimore County and then you would get that sweet health care!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »