Community Surrounding Solo Cup Says 'No' to Foundry Row
Patch hit the streets to speak with residents and business owners near the Solo Cup plant, where developers are proposing to build the Wegmans-anchored center Foundry Row. Here's what they said.
As developers make moves on three Owings Mills projects, residents and business owners near the most controversial of the three remain concerned about negative impacts to the community.
From grocery store employees to business owners to residents of Mill Towne Village Apartments, everyone's got something to say about Foundry Row, the Wegmans-anchored center proposed for the Solo Cup plant.
Developer Greenberg Gibbons has applied to down-zone the property from manufacturing to retail, and plans to build a 130,000 square foot Wegmans, approximately 243,000 square feet of other retail, 13,500 square feet of restaurants and 40,000 square feet of office space.
The developers behind two other projects -- the transit-oriented Metro Centre development and the Owings Mills Mall revamp -- have voiced their opposition to Foundry Row, citing traffic and an oversupply of retail among their concerns.
Patch conducted random man-on-the-street interviews in the area around the Solo Cup plant and the apartments directly across the street. Most people interviewed have concerns with the project.
Charmaine Brown, a Safeway employee, said she thought the development, specifically the Wegmans that will anchor the project, would have a negative effect on surrounding businesses, including Safeway.
“Traffic is the main reason why everybody’s against [the Solo Cup development],” she said.
Several others cited traffic as a major concern.
“Every day there’s an accident,” said Mabin Prabsan, the manager of Deli 23, an Owings Mills convenience store. “If they come, maybe every day [there will be] 20.”
Justin Rosen, a resident of Mill Towne Village Apartments, which is directly across from Solo Cup, said that he believed that the difficult turn into the apartment community will become even harder with the introduction of Foundry Row. New to the area, Rosen explained that he didn’t know too much about the issue, but wondered why the Wegmans couldn’t be a part of the Owings Mills Mall redevelopment.
Some don't think community opposition has much power in this situation.
“They may do [the three projects together] no matter what people want, and we’ll have to live with the consequences,” said Charles Winkelman, the owner of Signs by Tomorrow, an Owings Mills sign and graphics company. Winkelman is pessimistic about the Foundry Row project because of the current economic climate.
“Just a little drive about will tell you how many retailers are hurting in this area, and now they’re going to build a humongous campus to compete with these folks,” he said.
Prabsan had similar sentiments, saying that business was hurting, and the addition of the Wegmans could put him out of business.
While many oppose Foundry Row, there are some local residents that see the potential benefits.
“It brings something new and something interesting to the community,” said Janet Barnes, who lives in Mill Towne Village. Barnes shops at Giant, and doesn’t expect that to change with a Wegmans nearby. Still, she sees herself shopping at the new grocery anchor occasionally because of the convenient location.
Those on both sides of the fence will hear about the fate of the proposed development on Tuesday, Aug. 28, when the Baltimore County Council votes whether or not to rezone the Solo Cup plant.
nick allen
11:38 am on Friday, August 3, 2012
Why are people so focused on the traffic issue. The fact that Wegman's wants to come to owings mills is awesome. I would want to have to work with the current developers of owings mulls mall either considering their track record.
Shirley Supik
2:21 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
The reason people are so focused on traffic is (1) because the State Highway Adm. has already said that is a failing intersection without Foundry Row, (2) because Senator Bobby Zirkin is concerned about the traffic, (3) because the General Assembly is concerned over the traffic, (4) because our Governor is concerned over the traffic and (5) because Greenberg Gibbons will not release a complete and adequate traffic study and he tried to block Sen. Zircon and the General Assembly from getting a traffic study. What is he trying to hide? Also, this project will put about 6,000 more cars on Reisterstown Road everyday and the people who travel that road are already feed up with it.
KW
7:15 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Shirley, you say that there needs to be a traffic study, then you quote numbers and facts about the impact of the Wegmans/Foundry Row project on traffic (how many cars will be put on the road because of the project, etc). If there has not been any study or an adequate study, where are you getting these numbers from?
Maryland
5:02 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012
Nice sample, Dustin. I guess Howard Brown and Kimco weren't available for comment.
ddbs00
6:52 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
LOL!
Shirley Supik
2:26 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Dustin, I am glad Patch finally started looking at the real picture. Now that you are telling the truth, they are trying to say you are in bed with Brown and Kimco. How does it feel? Sorry Senator Zirkin for spelling your name wrong in my last comment. The fingers engaged before the brain.
Marc Shapiro
1:31 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
As we mentioned in the article, the people in the interview were literally approached on the street at random, and this is what they told us. Our coverage has been nothing but balanced, and we have Kimco and Brown on the record numerous times stating their opinions. I'd be happy to point you in the direction of some of our previous coverage if you'd like.
KW
12:36 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
Owings Mills desperately needs a well-regarded retailer to elevate its status. Metro Center will help, but isn't a real draw for non-locals. The new mall plans sound like a resurrection of the same failing mall we had, but with JCPenney and Macy's as the primary anchors. Nothing revolutionary there - I'll keep going to Towson or Columbia where I have more options, thanks. But, Wegmans - Wegmans can put us back on the map and draw buyers from outside of our area. Those buyers might also shop at nearby retailers. This is what we want - let's make it happen. We can find solutions to traffic issues.
Shirley Supik
2:32 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Let's find out what all the traffic problems are first before we put 400,000 sq. ft. of retail on that corner. Let's fix those problems if we can and see if that project is feasable with the existing infrastructure.
KW
4:42 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
A traffic study has been completed. Problems have been assessed. Solutions have been determined. The Foundry Row developer will pay for road improvements.
KW
12:54 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
Those resisting rezoning should consider that the site is already zoned for manufacturing. Without any ado, a manufacturer of who-knows-what could come into operation spewing noxious chemicals/smells, making noise at all hours, overburdening the roads during their shift-changes, etc. I think Wegmans is a good choice and better than manufacturing at the site: it brings jobs, improves our retail choices, and should provide aesthetic value as well.
Btw, I live a mile from Solo, and I support the site rezoning and the Foundry Row development.
Shirley Supik
2:37 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
When Solo Cup was there, they made their shift changes so as not to be in peak hour traffic. Foundry Row will put 600 more employee cars on the road than worked at Solo, not to mention the amount of cars for the shoppers. If someone in your family had the oportunity to work for MFG. payscale or Wegman's payscale, they would be jumping up and down for MFG.
KW
4:49 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Whether a mfg job pays more than working at Wegmans has no bearing on my arguments in favor of Wegmans and Foundry Row.
Momofmany
9:54 pm on Saturday, August 11, 2012
In case you didn't realize it this isn't China, Mexico or the wholly owned US govt.GM corporation. Therefore the chance of some type of manufacturing coming to the Solo site is about as good as a profitable steelmaker coming to Sparrows Point! In fact if you didn't notice it we gave away most if not all manufacturing when we started paying the unskilled workers who push those buttons about $85/hr.? So while there are many issues with a "traffic study" the probability of having a big factory is not one of them. Besides the factory might prefer the soon to be x-Safeway or x-Giant sites they will be vacant within a year of the Wegman's project adding more blight to the area with more empty square footage. But don't panic yet because we could always get M.O.M. to call another "special session" and take the returned state owned slot machines and place them at both sites? And just think about it? Those revenues could then air condition all of our schools (as promised) and repair their crumbling infrastructure? So where does it all end................."Politics" aint it grand!
Sher Katz
7:43 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
Solo Site/Foundry Row=426,500 square feet of retail space. Metro Centre more than 2 million square feet of developed commercial space-hotel, school, library, apartments, restaurants, stores, offices, etc. Which do you think will bring more traffic? Metro Centre is 6/10 of a mile from this same intersection and the solo site. Doesn't anyone else see how crazy it is to complain about Wegmans when the Metro Centre is going to be 5 times the size??
blgggc
2:34 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Not a fair comparison. Retail uses draw far more people in and out than office product. Plus, Metro Centre wll utilize the in-place subway system and Interstate 795 without clogging up the already-congested Reisterstown Road. I have to laugh at all of these comments which are obviously written from the same company. We don't believe you!! You are about to be saddled with a $15 million white elephant. Show us the trafifc study already.
Shirley Supik
2:40 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
See, now you are starting to understand why we just don't need anymore traffic! Metro Center and the Mall have already been approved, but Foundry Row hasn't, so we need to stop it before they throw any more traffic in the mix.
Sher Katz
2:49 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
since I couldn't reply to the submittions below I am forced to reply to my own statement-this is to bigggc-I'm not with any company so I guess you can stop laughing-I'm a stay at home Mom. So with that theory out the window. Lets deal with your comment of 795 and the subway systems-Metro Centre to the corner of Painters Mills where the end of Solo is located is 6/10th of a mile. It truly makes little difference the same roads and same Metro system will be used. Unless of course the 250 room hotel slated for the Metro centre is only going to house people coming from Baltimore on the Metro and the 1700 residents won't own cars, nor will any of the CCBC students or users of the library. And the 300,000 square feet of retail space at the Metro won't bring any vehicles down Reisterstown Road or Painter Mill Road. It is a fair comparison, I've been driving those roads for 10 years.
Sher Katz
2:53 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
To Shirley Supik's comment below...exactly when will General Growth and Kimco begin working on the mall? Kimco hasn't brought the intended Rite Aid to the Frank's Craft location farther up Reisterstown Road-that's been boarded up for years. It's an eye sore and a hazard.
Maryland
9:00 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
"Several others cited traffic as a major concern."
Then why didn't you link to the 3 week old article about the Foundry Row traffic study from your own website?
Marc Shapiro
1:35 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
There's a link on the side of the page to that story, as well as a lot of our other coverage.
Donkey Kong
9:02 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
Unless Wegmans or one of the partner shops is in the graphic arts business, why in the world would that Signs by Tomorrow guy be against a project which could bring more potential customers to his business?
rona gerskov
10:25 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
This is absolute baloney!! The group of "volunteers" approaching people at the Garrison Forest Shopping center ask questions directing responses to the answer "too much traffic" without ever mentioning Wegmans coming to Foundry Row. This whole thing is absolute bs and there will be a lot of angry Owings Mills residents if Foundry Row isn't built because of the machinations of one developer making it appear that people are worried about traffic. Baloney! He's worried about Wegmans.
Sher Katz
3:56 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Rona did you see the teenagers at the intersection of OM Blvd and Reisterstown Road in front of Safeway on the day when it was 104 degrees handing out water with Say No to Solo signs to passing cars?? Shirley Supik should be ashamed of herself having those kids out there that day.
Chuck Burton
10:27 am on Monday, August 6, 2012
Foundry Row seems as though it will bring higher quality merchants to OM, and we can certainly use some!! Wegmans, for example, is a fine company, rated as one of the best employers in America; and with its neighbors will likely account for around a thousand new jobs for OM. If a new manufacturer could even be found for the site, it would certainly automate as much as possible and hire as few workers as possible - higher paid, to be sure, but requiring higher levels of education and training. And who would want a manufacturing site surrounded by commercial and residential users. Maybe some Chinese company seeking to cut costs by locating an assembly operation closer to its American customers? Who knows? Or maybe another company stinking up the area the way Sweetheart used to do.
And I've never understood Mr. Brown's opposition to Foundry Row - it would seem to complement Metro Centre, and help build business for both. As for the Mall -fugeddabadit!
Shirley Supik
3:07 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Chuck, You need to update your thinking. Haven't you read all the recent articles about mfg. coming back to Maryland? We don't have to mfg. "smelly" things anymore. There are high tech companies out there, making "GREEN" things for our future. Don't be so narrowminded.
KW
4:55 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
We don't have to manufacturer "smelly" things anymore? I sure wish you'd tell that to some of the current manufacturers in the area - I am regularly assaulted by the smells from their manufaturing plants. I don't want more of the same, and we don't know what manufacturer might move into the area. We know what we are getting with Wegmans/Foundry Row.
David cohn
12:29 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Obviously, the economy is hurting everywhere. But if retail business is down in Owings Mills, which causes store vacancies, perhaps it's because people are going to Hunt Valley, TowsonTown, and Columbial. At least there the shopping environment and selection of stores draws people in, even from miles away. I believe all three new developments in OM will bring back these customers, even benefiting existing retailers.
Sher Katz
12:49 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
I went to Towson and Lutherville yesterday to go clothes shopping for my kids. Money that could have been spent in Owings Mills, too bad the only options are Target and Walmart. I don't go to the mall, it isn't safe.
Zoobie
12:42 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Replacing the 'eye sore' Solo Building with a dressed-up Wegmans.......it's a no-brainer! Get it built !!!
Chuck Burton
1:11 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
If Wegmans is approved and built, I will likely shop there every week or two, but I will still go to Trader Joe about as often, and to my favorite Giant and Aldi at Cherry Valley each week (no traffic lights), and sometimes Mars. Most other people will doubtless do something similar, and existing markets will lose little or none of their business. Wegmans will draw much of its business from as far as NW Baltimore, Eldersburg and Hampstead, even Westminster and Hanover, PA. And if those customers find other quality stores in the area, they will shop there, as well, so Wegmans can potentially spark a renaissance for all of OM. Bring it on!!
Chuck Burton
1:31 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
What else does OM have to offer: Stevenson University and a branch of BCCC, with athletics at the Uni and arts at the Uni and JCC, the new library, a couple of mega-movies... come on, that's a beginning!
Shirley Supik
3:15 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Don't take my word for it, ask the people who work at the Giant right next door to the proposed Foundry Row or the people who work at Safeway, or the businesses along the Reisterstown Road Corridor how they feel about Foundry Row. You and these others don't want to hear it. Go back and read Dustin's article again. You may not want the opposition, but it is here. And it is bigger and stronger than you can imagine.
Sher Katz
3:26 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
People at that Giant are worried about their jobs because Giant's prices are higher, the stores smaller, the selection less, the quality less, and if I dare say dirtier.
I personally haven't run into anyone other that your followers Ms. Supik who are against Foundry Row. 4 of my kids go to different schools-no one I've spoken to at any of the schools are against Foundry Row, nor are any of my friends, members of my house of worship (located in Reisterstown) nor my gym, where I get my hair cut and nails done. My husband and I have even been privy to over hearing conversations in local restaurants in the last couple of months about people who can't wait for Wegmans.
Chuck Burton
3:16 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
To Shirley Supik and others concerned about Reisterstown Rd traffic around the proposed Foundry Row project:
Greenberg Gibbons has said they will give up part of their property to add extra lanes to Reisterstown Rd and Painters Mill Rd, including two left turn lanes. This seems to be about as much as can be expected, unless the state is willing to condemn the necessary land and build at least one, perhaps two extra lanes each way from Pikesville to Owings Mills Blvd, or beyond. Ain't gonna happen!! But it's what you get when you concentrate all the traffic on one road with cul-de-sacs, instead of having parallels with interconnections. So, is that a reason to deny a development that has the promise of helping to make this a real community instead of a squabbling bunch of nimbys? I wonder.
Shirley Supik
3:47 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Absolutely, Chuck. You are talking the safety of our citizens and communities. All that glitters is not gold and to make decisions based on greedy, I want everything thinking is negligent and dangerous. You already take your life in your hands on that road. A traffic study will be able to save lives in the long run.
Maryland
4:30 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Enough paralysis by analysis, because that is the real goal of this group. SHA has studied this intersection for 10 years due to the expected impact from the mall and Metro Centre, and we finally have the opportunity to get the improvements done due to private funding from Foundry Row. Anyone that thinks another traffic study will suddenly satisfy the opposition has another thing coming.
KW
4:38 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Shirley, you and "Vote No" keep saying we need to study the issues before deciding. The issue has been studied. There has been an economic impact study and a traffic study (interestingly, completed by the same company that produced a traffic study for Metro Center). The traffic study produced viable solutions to the increased traffic.
Shirley Supik
3:20 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
All these hateful comments, because Dustin told the truth. Sad isn't it.
KW
3:34 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Shirley: I don't see a bunch of hateful comments, just people expressing an opinion different than yours. To address some of your comments-
1. I don't know where you've gotten your info about how many workers cars will be at Foundry Row, so I can't comment except to say your numbers don't sound correct.
2. Everyone has agreed the existing infrastructure won't support the new project. That is why the developer plans to make changes to the roads.
3. While employees at Giant may not be able to see the benefit of Foundry Row, the owners of the Giant shopping center (St. Thomas) obviously do, because they have expressed their support of the project. I believe they also proposed joining their parking lot to Foundry Row's.
Chuck Burton
4:27 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Shirley, a traffic study is just that, a study. It may point to solutions, but it solves nothing by itself. GG had a study done, and I agree they should release it entirely, but apparently it ponted out some solutions, and they say they will follow up on them. Good enough. I drive Reisterstown Rd, though usually not at rush hours, (I'm in my 80s), and I find the worst section to be between Pikesville and McDonough Rd, with Home Depot to Owings Mills Blvd almost as bad. When I moved here, back in the 70s, there were 6 traffic lights between the Beltway and where I live - now there are 16. I think! I'd like to see OM become a real community while I'm still here, and that means having things of quality available. Walmart and Target and Big Lots! don't do it, and the Mall is a failure, because of its out-of-sight-out-of-mind location. That leaves Metro Centre and Foundry Row as about the only possible nucleus of something good, and they should be working together, not fighting one another!
Chuck Burton
4:44 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012
Actually, it just seems to be a one way thing - Mr Brown fighting GG.
Shirley Supik
2:34 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
For KW and Chuck, There were 2500 workers at Solo. There will be 3100 at Foundry Row. Already 600 more than Solo and they worked on 3 non peak shifts. Foundry Row is one third the size of Huntvalley. Taking one third of the cars that shop at Huntvalley, we are talking between 3,000 & 5,000 shoppers at Foundry Row. Add them up. Mr. Gibbons supplied the #'s for Solo workers and his future employees.The traffic report that you refer to KW, Mr. Gibbons will not release and and an Administrative Law Judge threw out his traffic report when Senator Bobby Zirkin went for a traffic study request stating that Mr. Gibbons report was not a true and accurate portrayal of the traffic. Mr. Gibbons did the same thing at the Greenspring Station. One more thing, KW. You give me too much credit when you use the word "followers". In the last 2 weeks alone, we have signed 4,000 people who object to Foundry Row. I do not have a "following". I have well informed intelligent people who understand what is at stake. People who are sick of dirty politics. People who have had enough big business shoved down their throats without their voice being heard.
KW
4:59 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Shirley, I, too, am sick of dirty politics, including those practiced by your Vote No group. Your group is no better than the corrupt politicians you claim to be fighting against. Vote No deceives people, building sham support. If you were truly about integrity, your group would make it clear that signing your petition is akin to saying "No" to Wegmans. Tell people that Wegmans has refused to go to the mall for 7 years. Tell them that the Foundry Row developer has proposed solutions to the traffic. Tell them that the developer could build other projects (right now, without the need for a zoning change), like an office park, that would worsen rush hour traffic. Tell people the -whole- truth, so they can decide for themselves.
But, you won't do that because then you might not have all the support you and the big business(es) whose cause you trumpet need/claim.
SouixsieSouix
9:14 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Quick, honest question - What can go there that won't increase traffic congestion? Maybe another manufacture who will create new jobs? But how will that work with traffic at peak hours when workers come in and out of the area? Is there an opportunity to create affordable housing in the area where workers could walk/bike to work?
Shirley Supik
11:57 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Souixsie, when Solo was there they had 3 shifts and none of them were at peak traffic. They spaced them between the peaks to avoid traffic problems. They even brought in most of their trucks at night. Are you saying there is no affordable housing in O.M.?
Pamela F
1:14 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
I shop at Wegman's in Hunt Valley and Columbia--I also shop at Giant, Aldi and Mars --most grocery shoppers do the same--we go to different stores for different things. I love the Wegman's experience--the customer service is top notch. I would hope that the other retailers would follow there model and step up the customer service in their stores!!! Wegman's is consistently rated by its employees as the best place to work.
Anyone opposing this high quality retailer coming to Foundry Row should take a ride to Columbia and see how they IMPROVED the flow of traffic in the area. They did a wonderful job of controlling traffic approaching the store AND on the store's actual property. Wegman's is a win-win for Reisterstown Road --we should be honored that they chose Owings Mills!!!
Maryland
2:49 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
I checked their website, and Greenberg Gibbons doesn't appear to have anything to do with Greenspring Station, Shirley. Where do you get your info?
Sher Katz
3:19 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Foxleigh Management is the company who manages Greenspring Station. Just look at Greenspring Station's website.
Shirley Supik
12:03 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Maryland, I wasn't refering to Greenberg Gibbons with Greenspring Station. I was refering to the company that did their traffic study. Neither Gibbons, Glazer or Brown are qualified to do a traffic study. That has to be done by a company. In both the Foundry Row traffic study and the one done for the Greenspring Station, an Administration Law Judge threw them out for not giving a true and accurate assessment of the amount of traffic in those areas.
Sher Katz
3:23 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
4,000 signatures...how many of those were really told the truth before they signed? If any of those signatures included one's obtained in front of the Giant or Safeway I would bet most were mislead. I was approached by 2 people and my neighbor has been approached several times as well. Each time the verbal delivery was such that it was not clear that obtaining our signatures would mean a vote AGAINST Foundry Row and Wegmans. Silly us, we asked questions and read before signed. Oh, that's right, we didn't sign. And how many people just signed to get "your people" out of their face?
Chuck Burton
3:34 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Shirley, did your pollsters give people a choice of for or against Foundry Row? If not, it wasn't an honest poll. You could probably get 4000 people to say they want to keep Solo there, even after they've already left. And I'm sure it woiuld be easy to find 4000, or more who want Foundry Row and, especially, Wegmans.
Shirley Supik
12:09 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Chuck, when I speak to the people on the street, when I tell them that it is not just a Wegman's but a 400,000 sq. ft. shopping center at that corner, they usually say, "Oh, no. NO MORE TRAFFIC." Or they will say, "We don't need another shopping center. Fix the Mall and put Wegman's there." I can only tell you that most people I have talked to believe the mall should be fixed first before adding another shopping center, especially there.
Sher Katz
12:30 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
"Would you like to sign this petition to limit the amount of traffic on Reisterstown Road and would you like a free snow cone" said one of Say No to Solo representatives in front of Safeway a couple of weeks ago.
KW
1:49 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The 400,000 sq ft number includes 130,000 sq ft for Wegmans, doesn't it?
My family was urged to sign a petition to get Wegmans to go to the mall instead of Reisterstown Rd - as if that is a valid option.
Sher Katz
3:35 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
When Solo closed there were 540 workers layed off. When did they have 2400? In 2010 they said they were closing 3 plants-Maryland, Massachusetts and Missouri - in all 3 plants there was only a total of 1240 workers. They only owned that property since 2004 when they bought Sweetheart cup company. Sweetheart operated in Owings Mills since about 1919, under different names as they grew through out the years. Less than 10 minutes worth of internet research.
Chuck Burton
4:05 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Maybe those aren't the only numbers Shirley is fudging?
Shirley Supik
12:14 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Sher, if you want all the facts, when this plant started in 1919, it was call Ft. Howard. Then Maryland Cup, then Sweetheart Cup, then Solo Cup. It closed in 2011. As a matter of fact the plant was still operating when it was put up for sale last year. If you do not like the figures I gave you, then you should call Mr. Gibbons because it is one of his reports that states that Solo had 2500 employees. And on this I believe he is correct at the peak of their operation.
Sher Katz
12:27 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
yes Ms. Supik I was able to discover the prior owners of the property as well, it just didn't merit listing them all, hence the line, "under different names".
BCalvert
10:11 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
You know, I am really disappointed that there was no coverage of the County Council meeting the other night. I was there showing my disapproval of the redevelopment of the Solo Cup along with about 100 other people holding signs and wearing buttons, and not one Patch reporter there has reported anything on it. That was a well-orchestrated showing on the part of the Say No to Solo people and I feel it should have been reported on. However, the Patch itself seems to be biased as this is the first article that even acknowledges that there is real support in the community against the rezoning. Marc Shapiro does not seem to think so and refuses to report on it in such a manner and the same goes for Bryan Sears. I hope the Patch will begin showing both sides to this story and reporting when real people show real support like they did on Monday. I mean how can you not report on seeing 100 signs waving in the air and people wearing bright green buttons, not to mention the County Council's faces when they saw the crowd. And how about the comments made by citizens? Vicki Almond had to slam the gavel how many times to try and control the room? If that's not worth reporting on, then I don't know what is.
Chuck Burton
10:22 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
You don't mention how many people were supporting Foundry Row.
Actually, I thought the vote on the matter was to be on August 28 - that is when supporters should turn out. But, I agree, Patch should have given coverage even to orchestrated opposition.
Marc Shapiro
1:42 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
BCalvert- We have been reporting both sides of this story from the very beginning. Bryan Sears covers the county council, and we are planning to use photos and arguments from the meeting in future stories.
KW
2:11 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I, too, thought that the next meeting to attend was the vote on the 28th. I didn't learn that people were turning out to discuss the Solo rezoning until the meeting had already started.
I will be at the meeting on the 28th to show my support for the rezoning/Foundry Row-Wegmans project. Anyone else who supports the project should email Ms. Almond and the council (council2 @ baltimorecountymd.gov & countycouncil @ baltimorecountymd.gov) to let them know, and turn out for the meeting, as well.
BCalvert
9:33 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Marc - I look forward to reading about coverage from that meeting.
Tracie
12:02 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
I would think that if there are as many people blogging about how much Foundry Row needs to be approved, they would have been there last week to speak... And if you didn't know there was a CC meeting last week, then you aren't as informed as you claim to be.... The turnout was phenomenal for the opposition....I loved every minute!!!!
KW
9:30 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
The council already had meetings to hear comments on zoning issues. The meeting earlier this month was not for that purpose. However, your coalition chose to go any way. That is why only the coalition and a couple others attended the meeting. This was probably in an orchestrated attempt by the coalition to make it seem as though there was little or no support for the project.
In general, people are much more likely to go out of their way to complain about something than they are to say they like something. So even when a minority oppose an issue, they can be so vocal as to appear that they are the majority. It is unfortunate but true.
BrownGirl71
9:42 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
The monthly County Council meeting is public, which means any member of the public can attend and have an opportunity to voice a concern. That's what 100+ members of the public who oppose the rezoning request did on August 6. Those in support of rezoning could have done the same thing if they chose to.
Shirley Supik
12:18 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Chuck, I was there at the Council Meeting and there were only two issues. Four people spoke on one issue and the rest were against Solo. Not one supporter for Foundry Row. Not even Mr. Gibbons.
Sher Katz
12:40 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Honestly, its probably because of your antics that not many people are taking you seriously and are begining to find your efforts a pathetic attempt to not have the rezoning passed. Having people almost bribe the public with free water on the hottest day of the year, having those kids stand out there on Reisterstown road in the heat, offering free snow cones, asking them to sign petitions without giving the full truth, accusing the developers of failure of transparency-when you won't release your own financial backers for the say no to solo coalition, posting hundreds of bright orange signs around Garrison Forest Plaza, then posting those huge wooden signs that were dangerous as they blew down in a windstorm-hope no one was hurt by them, removing comments from the coalition's facebook page when confronted with an issue you don't like, posting the outdated traffic study when there was a newer one, the robo calls with the veiled "survey questions" that were all squewed in the direction to be against the rezoning, to locals who are do not call lists- I got called 3 times and I'm on the do not call list, the post card mailings...anyone else want to chime in?
Shirley Supik
1:23 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Sher, thank you for voicing your opinion. This is exactly the reason we started the coalition; so everyone has a voice. I will say that after hearing you, I'm beginning to believe you work for Greenberg Gibbons. Is he giving you gifts, paying you or has he sent you on a cushy vacation?
Sher Katz
1:33 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
As I stated before I am a stay at home Mom. I do not work for Greenberg Gibbons or anyone else for that matter. I have 4 kids. 1 in college, 2 in high school, 1 in elementary school.
Why do you have to resort to accusing someone of unsavory behavior when their views opposed yours? This just adds credibility to your increasingly desperate behaviors, actions, and words.
Innuendo will not help your cause. Straight facts and honesty will. But frankly I haven't seem much of that.
Maryland
1:39 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Is that a hint of projection, Shirley? Or are we still to believe that you and your husband funded the robo calls, push polls, mailers, petition drive and print ads all by yourselves?
KW
1:58 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Here we go (again) -trying to reduce someone's credibility by accusing them of working for (bribes from) your opponent. Come on, Shirley, put this one back in your bag of tricks. It's getting old.
You are quick to accuse others of wrong doing, yet, won't tell how you've funded this huge campaign against Foundry Row or address the deceptive tactics used by your coalition.
blggc
1:26 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Brian Gibbons just said on WYPR that the "traffic study is posted on the FR Facebook page and that it is being shared with community groups." I cannot find it. Can someone post the link to it here? Also, that "back road" he is talking about that will alleviate congestion on Reisterstown Road. Where does it start and stop? Not clear.
Sher Katz
1:42 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
NPR said they will post it on their site as well.
Marc Shapiro
1:48 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
The full study has not been released, but here is what we wrote about a summary of the study: http://owingsmills.patch.com/articles/memo-foundry-row-improvements-could-solve-traffic-woes
The back road is a service road that exists today, it runs parallel to Reisterstown Road behind Solo Cup and could go from Painters Mill all the way to Valley Center if all of the property owners allow Greenberg Gibbons those connections.
Sher Katz
4:37 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Another question, maybe Mr Shapiro can find the answer to this one. The Metro Centre on Painters Mills Road, which is 6/10th of a mile from Reisterstown Road is going to be 5 times the proposed size of Foundry Row and essentially use the same roads. Was any consideration made for the increased traffic that will be created when the Metro Centre is completed? Did they have to file traffic studies? Did anyone consider the increased traffic that will be created for that development. Its truly unreasonable to expect the majority of the users of establishments in the Metro Centre will come via public transportation.
Chuck Burton
5:00 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Another point about Painters Mill Rd (which I pointed put earlier and elsewhere) is that not only is it the main access road to Metro Centre, but that I believe it is in the flood plain of Gwynns Falls and Red Run, and could be inaccessable in at least a major flood.
ddbs00
7:16 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Link to the study (it's a PDF file): http://www.hostedfiles.org/ggc/facebook/FoundryRowTrafficImpactStudy.pdf
BCalvert
9:32 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
There is no copy of the full study anywhere online. Gibbons has not released the full study... what he has released is a summary of the study, which I can't trust because how do we know what has not been included in that study summary?
blggc
1:57 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Marc: He clearly said it was on their FaceBook page. Is this true or not? And, why would adjacent property owners allow these connections? Thanks.
Shirley Supik
2:21 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
To respond to Sher, Maryland and KW, This is a Brian Gibbons tactic. He has been acusing since the coalition was formed and just insinuated again on the air that I work for Kimco or Howard Brown. I am tired of saying I am not. If I had their backing I would have hundreds of people on the street telling the truth and signing people up. And Maryland, you inferred that the author of this article was in bed with Kimco & Brown in an early comment here. See you don't like it when someone does it to you. I am proud of everyone of you who voice their opinion whether I agree or not. We all must stand up for what we believe in, and that is what I am doing.
Shirley Supik
2:23 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
One of those property owners is Howard Brown & David Cordish. You know Brown will never allow that road to go through.
KW
2:37 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
And why wouldn't Howard Brown -ever- agree to let the road go through? If Foundry Row is built, that road would be in the best interest of Owings Mills. I thought Howard Brown wanted what's in the best interest of Owings Mills...
More accurately, he wants what's in his own best interest.
Sher Katz
2:38 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
So why not remove all doubt and release your financial backers? And to further that, aren't you a "non profit"? Aren't you required to make public your IRS form 990 - information returns and IRS form 1023-Application for Recognition of Tax Exemption. That might clear up the issue of who you really work for? Maybe Mr. Shapiro would do your cause some good if you sent those documents to him and he could write an article in favor of your cause.
And no,again, I don't currently work, but I did before moving here, almost 10 years ago. Hence my knowledge of IRS forms.
KW
2:33 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Shirley, thanks for clarifying. However, there is a diffence between your accusations and those of others:
You accuse a single commenter of working for bribes just because they state a contrary opinion.
Others accuse you of possibly working for the benefit of David S. Brown and/or Kimco because of the lack of transparency of your group. You are obviously well-funded. You've produced multiple billboards and uncountable yard signs, conducted robo calls/telephone surveys, provided bottled water to residents to sway them to your cause, provided snow cones for the same purpose, provided branded fans at 4th of July parades, t-shirts, etc. That all takes money, yet you refuse to divulge where that money comes from. That is suspicious, especially given that your cause is financially beneficial to two large Owings Mills developers. Hmmm...
Chuck Burton
4:03 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
I guess it was Shirley who had all those signs and giveaways in front of Safeway - was that the source of her funding? I'd think Safeway would be anti Giant, since Giant's near monopoly in the corridor killed their Pikesville store. Or maybe that is the source. Maybe Giant is afraid they'll lose their St Thomas store, at least. Hmmm? Did they have anything to do with the disappearance of Weis and Shoppers? Though the Weis manager told me Valley Center wanted to raise their rent too much.
KW
9:59 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
After looking over the County Council meeting schedule, I see that Tuesday's meeting was not to discuss/hear zoning issues. It appears that the group opposed to the rezoning decided amongst themselves to "crash" that meeting. That explains why no one was there to voice support for the project.
KW
10:14 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
I see that those of you opposed to the project (Shirley, BCalvert, etc.) are clamoring to get your hands on the study. Why? Are you going to objectively consider the information presented, or simply look for points to twist and take out of context to support your position? Honestly, it seems like the latter - based on your rabid opposition no matter what.
I don't know why Greenberg Gibbons hasn't released the full traffic study. I also don't know if that is the way things are usually done. I am not, however, surprised at their desire to release only the minimum information required, because no matter what the study says, the opposition will likely twist it to their benefit. Less information equals less to twist. I do, however, think the council (or councilmember for the relevant district - district 2, in this case) should have the benefit of the full information (if that is what is commonly done in these matters). With that in mind, did David S. Brown make their traffic study public? If so, from where can it be downloaded?
D. Boola
11:07 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
In addition their is a constant presence of flashing "Sa No To Solo" ads on baltimorejewish.com, cannot even imagine how much that costs.
BCalvert
11:39 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
And Greenberg Gibbons has mailed out palm cards several times to residents up and down the Reisterstown Road corridor which I know is not cheap
Chuck Burton
11:51 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
BCalvert, what's a palm card? I've never gotten anything in the mail, either pro or con Foundry Row, and I live less than a mile away. I at least look at my junk before tossing it in the recycle bag.
Sher Katz
12:01 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
post card? I received 1 from the supporters of Foundry Row, which I believe was clearly marked who paid for it, and no phone calls. BUT from the opponents of the Foundry Row site, I received 2 post cards-1 to me and 1 to my husband, plus 3 phone calls-1 where the caller hung up on me when confronted with questions they could not answer. AND I've been approached by multiple people in front of Safeway in a manner that was barely polite, confrontational and misleading. And the 2 post cards, the phone calls and the in your face "sign my petition" people don't even admit they are with Say No to Solo even when wearing a button or a shirt that reflects that.
BrownGirl71
12:52 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
I live and shop in the area, and I received 3 postcards in support of Foundry Row. I read them each time and trashed them... No thank you, GG! There are plenty of other locations in NW Baltimore County to put a new retail mall-size shopping center. I am just not buying the gimmick that the SOLO Cup site is the only answer. Sorry to differ with so many STRONG, largely one-sided opinions here on Patch, but it is what it is. The elected officials will have to draw the line on Aug 28.
Sher Katz
11:52 am on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Just a thought, to what benefit would it be to the company performing the traffic study to squew it in any direction other than the truth. They get paid no matter if the rezoning goes through or not. If they would produce invalid traffic studies any company they would work for in the future wouldn't trust their findings leading to loss of business for them. Nor would municipalities trust their findings and wouldn't accept future proposals from other developers. It's doubtful they are owned by the developers of Foundry Row or anyone associated with them.
In addition, it is my understanding that if the rezoning goes through Greenberg Gibbons still needs to get approval from the Dept. of Transportation in order to gain access to state owned roads. Any alterations to existing "driveways" needs approval from the Dept of Transportation.
Maryland
3:58 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Traffic studies are released as part of the site development process, which follows zoning.
gabbyfan
5:05 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Sher Katz:
I love your posts.
They are written with consistent clarity and articulation.
You obviously understand the complex issues extremely well and are able to communicate strong messages in support of your position.
To supplement the income of your family, I believe you have the intelligence and writing ability to possibly work for a professional firm engaged in Social Media. You would be a strong asset to a company promoting a product, service or idea interested in spreading positive messages.
Something to think about -- good luck and I look forward to your future posts.
Sher Katz
5:33 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012
Thank you for the positive feedback gabbyfan.
I am currently working on finishing a second degree and hoping to reenter the job market summer 2013.
EB Levitt
9:03 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
KW expressed my thoughts exactly. Wegman's would draw consumers from outside the Owings Mills area who would shop at other local retailers. It sounds like the project would include traffic modifications that are greatly needed. I just look at the success of Hunt Valley Towne Center sparked by Wegman's and think that our area could use some well-regarded retailers who would create a "destination" and more vitality for our area. It would help our property values, too, by giving our area more prestige. Plus, I'd much rather see Wegman's than another manufacturing company at the site.
Chuck Burton
9:51 am on Saturday, August 11, 2012
Exactly!!
Chuck Burton
9:35 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Mom Of Many says the Safeway and Giant sites will be empty within a year od Wegmans opening, contributing to area blight. I notice that the Giant near the Hunt Valley Wegmans is still in business after these several years, and apparently doing well. By bringing in more shoppers, Wegmans might well contribute to an improvement in business for those other stores.
Dad of Dozens
12:49 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Chuck, Chuckie baby:
Apparently doing well. What do you base that on? It does well among those that apply the Yogi Berrism, "nobody goes there anymore because it is too crowded" theory. That Giant is a glorified 7-11. A store with a long-time lease cannot simply close because they will still owe the monthly rent. You are all starry-eyed by this store and cannot see the big picture, my man.
Chuck Burton
1:23 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Dad of Dozens - is that another version of Mom of Many? I'm sure Giant would love to know their stores are just glorified 7-11s. And if they wanted out of a lease, I'm sur their lawyers would find a way. As for being starry eyed abiut Wegmans, I go their mostly for paper goods, laundry supplies and staples - some meats cheeses and produce. I mostly avoid their specialties or I'll spend more than I want to there. Giant, Aldi, Trader Joe and Mars will still get most of my business when Wegmans comes in.
KW
1:21 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Dad of Dozens: The same can be asked of you: on what hard evidence do you base your comments? By what concrete measure is that Giant a glorified 7-11?
Also you've implied that the store only remains open because it has to continue to pay its lease. How do you know this? I don't run that Giant and am not privy to any inside information about its management or operations, however, stores do sometimes close before their lease is up. The store has to keep paying the lease, however, they don't have the additional expenses of an open store (electricity, workers, stock, etc., etc.) in addition to the lease. I would expect Giant to consider that option and take that course if it was appropriate for them.
KW
2:20 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012
Momofmany: You are obviously passionate about the community. You don't think manufacturing is a viable choice for the Solo site, so what do you think should go to the site?
You said that there is a lot of blight in the area, and Safeway and Giant (and other area businesses) will end up closing because of Wegmans, increasing the blight. This is a recurring argument from those opposed to the Foundry Row project. I'm curious: if the project is so bad for local business, why do you think so many of the local Chambers of Commerce expressed support of the project? These groups are made up of local business owners. They would not, presumably support a project that will put them all out of business.
Personally, I don't see what I consider lots of blight (besides the mall, Franks, and the horrid shopping center at Painters Mill and Reisterstown). I do see some empty space, but I think that is because we can't get the *right* retailers, not because we can't support the retail. This area has plenty of residents with money to spend and almost everyone shops elsewhere. That tells me that we can support more retail than what we have. I'm not convinced that David S. Brown knows what kind of retail we need. Baed on past comments and plans, I'm pretty sure that the mall developer doesn't know what we need. I have strong concerns about the success of those projects, and I don't think refusing a project that will likely be successful (Foundry Row) will help those projects or Owings Mills.
gabyfan
3:15 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Sher Katz:
Good luck with your second degree. You seem to have a natural flair for writing and presenting clear thoughts. I hope this degree is in the field of writing. You seem almost professional now!
You may also consider a part-time job now to supplement your family's income.
The field of Social Media allows people of all ages to work their own hours and from their homes. All you need is information to present issues and positions and, of course, great communication skills.
Which you have.
I am sure there are Social Media organizations in the Owings Mills area.
Good luck and keep up the GREAT work!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sher Katz
8:28 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Though my degree is not in writing, it is a business/math degree and will probably require a certain amount of writing reports. I have not thought of myself in the light of a professional writer, as math has been my strong suit.
If you know of any jobs that are available for a mid-career woman with 4 children at home, carrying a 16 credits each for the next two semesters, with 24 years of business experience, 14 of those in management, let me know.
It is an interesting concept of working for social media. I thoroughly love the research and get consumed by conveying the messages in a particular manner.
Again, thank you.
Sher Katz
12:48 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
BrownGirl, it would be interesting to see the geographic breakdown of the residents who compose these 7,100 signatures.
I would hope the county would put someone on that task, immediately, as to take a more informed view of the percentage of residents in our immediate area who actually object to this project.
Should someone who lives in Catonsville have a say about what goes on in Owings Mills? I live in Owings Mills and wouldn't begin to think I should tell a Catonsville resident what should happen in their community.
BrownGirl71
2:50 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Geography shouldn't matter. Everyone and anyone can have a stake in the outcome of the rezoning issue. People come from all over to work and play in Owings Mills. We pay State and County taxes and fees which may be used for any number of projects across the State and County. Just because someone lives in Catonsville does not mean he does not have an interest in what is happening in Owings Mills or any other place.
KW
6:41 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
BrownGirl, your argument has merit on the surface. Certainly, people other than those who actually live in the region could have a stake in this. However, it is also just as possible that people from outside the region aren't very knowledgable about and won't be affected by the issues here. The signatures are more legitimate when they are obtained from people in Owings Mills, whether for work or as residents. It seems a stretch to think that a random person selected from elsewhere in Baltimore County will be aware of the issues and be able to make an informed decision about the project. For that reason, it appears irresponsible and self-serving to obtain signatures from all around the county as the Vote No group has done. That action also seems to suggest that they could not garner enough support for their cause from people who have a vested interest in the area. Owings Mills alone has a population of over 30,000, plus many more people come here for work. If there is as much opposition as claimed, why travel all around the county for signatures when there are plenty to be had here?
I say that geography should and does have bearing.
BrownGirl71
10:21 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
@ KW - I beg to differ. It is entire possible and reasonable for people who live elsewhere to be very informed and interested in what is going on in other parts of the region. Just because I don't live in downtown Baltimore or on the Eastern Shore, does not mean I do not care or have a vested interest in the issues that impact those areas, for example. I just don't think it is fair to complete discount another's choice of which 'side' they are on concerning this issue simply because they don't have a physical address across the street from the project. Those charged with making this important decision about rezoning, which will end up costing all of us something, should seriously consider everything at their disposal, even those 7000+ signatures on the petitions.
KW
9:59 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
BrownGirl- You misunderstand me. I think that people who work in the area or come frequently for other reasons may have valid concerns about development, and their input should matter. Those people can be found directly in the OM area. It is not likely that a random person found at a grocery store in Timonium or a fair in Catonsville will be someone who meets that criteria.
Again, if there is so much opposition in the OM area, why not obtain signatures from the OM area where you will find most of the people who have a vested interest in this matter? Yes, a random person from Catonsville who doesn't come to OM much might have heard the news stories and have an opinion, but should their opinion be given the same weight as someone who lives in OM? I'd say not. We all have opinions, whether the subject is our business or not.
Chuck Burton
2:28 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
BrownGirl, you are correct that the county council will have to "draw the line on August 28". One wonders how many of Mr. Oliver's supporters will still suppport him after he leads a movement to deny District 4 voters the chance to conveniently shop and perhaps to WORK at Wegmans and the other businesses proposed for Foundry Row. The new Walmart won't give everyone a job who wants one.
BrownGirl71
3:04 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
@ Chuck... From what I have heard from people who oppose the rezoning is that this has nothing to do with loving or hating Ken Oliver... They are wanting to have a voice in the decision-making process and not feel like changes that affect their pocketbooks are being shoved down their throats. I also wonder about all these jobs that are allegedly going to come to the area. Are the majority of these jobs going to pay well enough to support a household (salary and benefits), or just more PT, seasonal type jobs that pay very little? Just asking the question...
Chuck Burton
2:45 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Also, if any mall sized shopping center in the NW area is in the wrong location, one could makle a good argument that it's the Owings Mills Mall.
Chuck Burton
9:19 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Brown Girl, you state that people come from all over to work and play in Owings Mills. Yes, there are a number of employers here, especially auto dealers, who might combine to hire the most people; but, from the traffic patterns, I think maybe more local people work elsewhere, than outside people work here. And, as for play, there are some bars and restaurants, a couple of movie-plexes, athletic events at Stevenson U. and the high schools, and a few plays, concerts and art shows there and at JCC, and that about covers it. We have to go elsewhere for most of our non-tube entertainment, and there isn't all that much to draw people in. Foundry Row won't change that, of course, but the better impression it makes may help to lead entrepreneurs to eventually bring in more activities. Worth a shot, anyway.
Shirley Supik
4:51 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
The Coalition actually collected a little over 9,500 signatures in Districts 1,2 & 4. We pulled 2,500 because they were not residents of Baltimore County. However, they worked or shopped or visited friend or family in our area and felt since they travel Reisterstown Road and shopped in this area they had a right to voice their opinion. Since these are the people we want to draw into the area for economics, I felt the same way, but I knew that some people would find fault with anyone but locals, so I opted for just those at 7,100.
Sher Katz
10:14 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Browngirl, Wegmans pays more than a decent salary and has excellent benefits for their employees. Do you live in Owings Mills and have teenagers or kids in college trying to get part time jobs to help pay their expenses? I do. Wegmans even pays their cashiers way more than minimum wage. My oldest son has worked fo 2+ years locally at the same job. His pay is more than $3 LESS an hour than what I understand Wegmans pays their cashiers. Yes, he has tried to get another job, guess what, there isn't any. My second oldest son, tried for half the summer to get a job, nothing. He's been volunteering ever since giving up looking for employment.
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/bestcompanies/2010/snapshots/3.html
BrownGirl71
10:41 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
@ Sher... Yes, I live here and yes, I have children... I am putting children through college now. That was the purpose of my question. There are a lot of people in this very situation, and I would like to know how many regular FT jobs with sufficient salary and benefits would really be in play to sustain a household... not just jobs for teenagers or PT seasonal, temp type jobs that generally require people to work multiple PT jobs or seek public assistance to make ends meet. Thanks for the link... I will check it out.